United States District Court for the District of New Jersey — chambers of Judge Julien Xavier Neals

In re CorMedix Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 2:21-cv-14020 (D.N.J.) — Opinion and Order of 30 June 2025, withdrawn

Withdrawn · 23 July 2025

SectorLegal

CountryUnited States

Document typeOpinion and Order on motions to dismiss (securities class action) — issued by the court itself

ConsequenceWithdrawn

What was fabricated

Two quotations attributed to the defendants that do not appear in the sources cited for them — that Todisco publicly stated CorMedix had "resolved all issues related to manufacturing", and that CorMedix issued statements in October 2019 that the company had "all necessary controls and processes in ... place for approval". The opinion also misstated the outcomes of cited cases, indicating that motions to dismiss were denied when they had in fact been granted. Errors identified by Chairman Grassley, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, in his letter of 6 October 2025.

What happened as a result

Defence counsel wrote to the court on 22 July 2025. On 23 July 2025 Judge Neals entered a text order (ECF No. 126) recording that the 30 June 2025 Opinion and Order "were entered in error" and directing the Clerk of Court to remove them from the docket. Judge Neals wrote to the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts on 20 October 2025, answering questions put by Senator Grassley on 6 October; the Senate Judiciary Committee published the reply on 23 October 2025.

Sources

Every incident is confirmed against at least one reputable source (mainstream news, legal/official, or the organisation itself). Nothing unverifiable is listed. Accuracy is non-negotiable — Ukweli is a truth product.

Reuse this recordThe Integrity Watch is published under CC BY 4.0 — free to reuse with attribution to Ukweli (The Orkestra). The full dataset is available as JSON, and the complete register is at ukweli.io/integrity.