Party logos belong to the parties and are shown for identification only. Ukweli is not affiliated with any party.
This analysis covers the IFP manifesto only. Ukweli assesses every party’s manifesto on the same terms. Other parties’ manifestos will be added as they are obtained.
Manifesto documents are sourced directly from party publications; Ukweli does not editorially select which parties to include or exclude.
Countdown to election day and the manifesto counts: Know the truth before you vote →
Summary of findings
Ukweli read the IFP’s 2026 local government manifesto and identified 68 separate promises. 42 have been assessed against the Constitution. Ukweli could not assess the other 26; the reasons are set out below.
Of the 42 assessed promises:
- 6 are about services a municipality is responsible for delivering.
- 20 are about how the council runs itself: its money, staff, decisions and how it answers to residents.
- 0 are shared with other spheres of government.
- 8 are outside municipal powers. No council can deliver them, whoever wins.
- 8 are commitments about the party's own conduct, not the council's.
Ukweli gives no overall score or grade to a manifesto. Each promise is assessed on its own, and the detail follows below.
The detail
Why only 42 of 68 promises are assessed
Ukweli reads every promise three separate times using an AI model, and checks each answer against the text of the Constitution. A verdict is published only when all three readings agree and every check passes. Where that did not happen, Ukweli publishes no verdict rather than a wrong one. These are the reasons the other 26 were not assessed. Click a reason to read more:
None of these reasons is a finding about a promise or about the party. Each describes a limit of Ukweli’s method. Ukweli may re-check these promises later.