What we did: we took the manifesto data for the twelve parties as at 22 October 2026 and counted every promise under each of the ten themes, by the verdict on each. Sources are listed at the end.
Party names. ACDP is the African Christian Democratic Party. AMM is the Afrika Mayibuye Movement. ANC is the African National Congress. DA is the Democratic Alliance. EFF is the Economic Freedom Fighters. FF Plus is the Freedom Front Plus. IFP is the Inkatha Freedom Party. SACP is the South African Communist Party. UDM is the United Democratic Movement. ActionSA and GOOD are the full names of those two parties. BOSA is written here as the party writes it in its manifesto.
We also keep Integrity Watch, a public register of documents that were corrected, withdrawn, refunded or punished after someone found made-up material in them.
This folio is about a different kind of check. It lines the ten themes up and asks, for each one, how much of it sits within a council’s powers and how many promises the manifestos make on it.
The 2026 local elections in short #
The vote. South Africans vote in local government elections on 4 November 2026. They choose the councillors who run 257 municipalities: 8 metropolitan (big-city), 44 district and 205 local. The Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) certified 136,790 candidates for 10,526 council seats. On 15 October 2026 the Constitutional Court directed the IEC to take the steps needed to put 181 ANC candidates on the ballot in six municipalities, so the final count will change. On 16 October 2026 the IEC said 32 other parties in the same position would get the same relief.
How many parties. 732 political parties are registered with the IEC at various levels. The IEC says 546 of them nominated candidates for this election.
Parties registered and nominated
Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) · post of 3 September 2026 · both bars use one scale
Show the numbers
| Stage | Parties | Source and date |
|---|---|---|
| Registered | 732 | IEC post on X, 3 September 2026 |
| Parties that nominated candidates | 546 | IEC post on X, 3 September 2026 |
What a council does. South Africa has three spheres of government: national, provincial and local. Part B of Schedules 4 and 5 of the Constitution list the matters a municipality may administer: 38 in all. Among them are drinking water and domestic waste-water and sewage systems, electricity and gas reticulation (the local networks), refuse removal, municipal roads and street trading. Jobs, schools, hospitals, welfare, the courts and immigration are not on those lists. A council can still lobby, partner with or press the government that holds the power.
What a manifesto is. A manifesto is a party’s published list of promises, so that voters can read them and decide.
What Ukweli did. Ukweli has analysed twelve party manifestos for this election. It found 2,419 promises and quoted each in the party’s own words, with its page. It checked each promise it could assess against the Constitution’s lists of what a council does. Where a sentence is too short or vague to test, or Ukweli’s checks did not settle it, the card says “Could not be assessed by Ukweli”. Where a sentence promises several things that fall under different powers or spheres of government, the card says “Mixes different powers”. Both labels describe Ukweli’s check, not the party.
What Ukweli found in twelve manifestos
Ukweli · promises, all twelve manifestos together · figures as at 22 October 2026
Who is in. The twelve parties are shown below. Ukweli analyses any 2026 local government manifesto it can obtain from the party’s own publication. That is a rule about documents, never a judgement about a party. Parties have reported 19 manifesto launches; for the other seven, Ukweli cannot reach a readable document online. Many other parties contest the election, and this folio does not cover them.
Each party’s assessment is one click away.
Read the assessment →ActionSA
Read the assessment →AMM
Read the assessment →ANC
Read the assessment →BOSA
Read the assessment →DA
Read the assessment →FF Plus
Read the assessment →GOOD
Read the assessment →IFP
Read the assessment →UDM
Read the assessment →Each button opens that party’s assessment on ukweli.io in a new tab, so this page stays open. Party logos belong to the parties and are shown for identification only. Ukweli is not affiliated with any party.
What Ukweli does not do. It does not score, grade, rank or endorse any party. It does not say whether a promise will be kept or whether it is affordable. A promise outside a council’s powers is not a false promise.
What the six groups mean
- A council’s own services
- The matter is on one of the municipal lists.
- How the council runs itself
- Staff, budgets, procurement, public participation and other administration.
- Shared with other spheres of government
- The power is split between spheres and neither leads.
- Led by another sphere, council has a role
- Another sphere of government leads, and the law gives the council a defined role.
- Outside a council’s powers
- The matter is not on the municipal lists. It is not about how the council runs itself, is not shared between spheres, and is not led by another sphere with a defined role for the council.
- The party’s own conduct
- What a party or its councillors will do, and general pledges that name no matter on a council’s lists. Ukweli judged it not a function of a council.
Figures in this section as at 22 October 2026. They come from the IEC, the Constitution’s schedules and Ukweli’s 2026 manifesto pages (sources at the end), and they move when a manifesto is added or the IEC publishes a new figure. Errors: hello@ukweli.io.
Who decides what sits within a council’s powers? #
South Africa has three spheres of government: national, provincial and local. A council is the local sphere. The matters a council has the right to run are listed in Part B of Schedule 4 and Part B of Schedule 5 of the Constitution (section 156(1)(a)). National or provincial law can assign it more (section 156(1)(b)). Ukweli’s table of powers holds 38 matters from those two lists, 15 from Schedule 4 and 23 from Schedule 5, and checks each promise against them. The table holds only those 38 matters. Folio 08 explains how.
Of the council-business promises in twelve 2026 manifestos, nearly a third ask for something that is not part of a council’s powers, or something another level of government leads. Whose power is it, and what will the candidate do about it?
The ten themes side by side #
Ukweli has published one folio on each of ten themes. Each promise sits under one theme only, so the ten add up to all 2,419 promises.
- Folio 10: safety and crime
- Folio 11: water and sanitation
- Folio 12: electricity and energy
- Folio 13: waste, environment and climate
- Folio 14: roads, transport and other infrastructure
- Folio 15: housing, land and title deeds
- Folio 16: health, social support, youth, sport and culture
- Folio 17: jobs, local economy and small business
- Folio 18: running the council
- Folio 19: party conduct and general pledges
This section uses two counts. The first is the share within a council’s own powers: of the promises in a theme that Ukweli could assess, how many are in the group “Within a council’s own powers”. The second is where the promises sit: how many promises are in the theme, out of all 2,419, including promises that carry no verdict.
Eight of the ten themes are services or matters a voter can name. The first figure below shows the first count for all ten. It orders the eight service themes by the count. Running the council and party conduct are not services, so they follow, drawn as outlines.
Ten themes: the share of assessed promises within a council’s own powers
Water and sanitation (84.5%) and waste, environment and climate (80.5%) have the highest shares. Housing (14.2%) and jobs (14.3%) have the lowest. In housing, most assessed promises are in the group “Led by another sphere, council has a role”: 59 of 106 (55.7%). In jobs, most are in “Outside a council’s powers”: 165 of 272 (60.7%).
Where the 2,419 promises sit: share of all promises, by theme
Running the council has the most promises: 736 (30.4%). Of its 659 assessed promises, 521 (79.1%) are in the group “How the council runs itself” and 7 are within a council’s own powers. Of the 153 assessed promises on party conduct, 114 (74.5%) are in the group “A party’s own conduct”. The first figure above shows the share within a council’s own powers for every theme, the graph puts the two counts together, and the table below gives every count.
Both counts on one graph: where a theme’s promises sit, and how much of it is within a council’s own powers
The key. Across is the share of all 2,419 promises. Up is the share of assessed promises within a council’s own powers.
- 1 Water and sanitation (Folio 11). Across 4.8%, up 84.5%.
- 2 Waste, environment and climate (Folio 13). Across 5.0%, up 80.5%.
- 3 Electricity and energy (Folio 12). Across 3.3%, up 48.5%.
- 4 Roads, transport and other infrastructure (Folio 14). Across 7.9%, up 48.0%.
- 5 Health, social support, youth, sport and culture (Folio 16). Across 10.7%, up 37.5%.
- 6 Safety and crime (Folio 10). Across 8.8%, up 20.6%.
- 7 Jobs, local economy and small business (Folio 17). Across 14.7%, up 14.3%.
- 8 Housing, land and title deeds (Folio 15). Across 6.5%, up 14.2%.
- 9 Running the council (Folio 18). Across 30.4%, up 1.1%.
- 10 Party conduct and general pledges (Folio 19). Across 7.8%, up 0.7%.
In whole promises, 392 are within a council’s own powers. Water and sanitation has the most (82), then waste (70), health and social (69) and roads (48). Every other theme has 39 or fewer.
The same counts as a table, with the other groups
Columns: Promises is all promises in the theme. Assessed is those with a verdict. The next seven columns are the groups of verdict. Mixes is “Mixes different powers”. Not assessed is “Could not be assessed by Ukweli”. The two columns Mixes and Not assessed carry no verdict.
| Theme | Promises | Share of all | Assessed | Own powers | Led by another sphere | Runs itself | Outside | Own conduct | Shared | Mixes | Not assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water and sanitation (Folio 11) | 117 | 4.8% | 97 | 82 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 12 |
| Waste, environment and climate (Folio 13) | 120 | 5.0% | 87 | 70 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 24 |
| Electricity and energy (Folio 12) | 79 | 3.3% | 66 | 32 | 18 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| Roads, transport and other infrastructure (Folio 14) | 192 | 7.9% | 100 | 48 | 11 | 32 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 31 | 61 |
| Health, social support, youth, sport and culture (Folio 16) | 260 | 10.7% | 184 | 69 | 25 | 40 | 47 | 3 | 0 | 34 | 42 |
| Safety and crime (Folio 10) | 212 | 8.8% | 141 | 29 | 62 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 42 | 29 |
| Jobs, local economy and small business (Folio 17) | 356 | 14.7% | 272 | 39 | 2 | 58 | 165 | 8 | 0 | 38 | 46 |
| Housing, land and title deeds (Folio 15) | 158 | 6.5% | 106 | 15 | 59 | 12 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 29 |
| Running the council (Folio 18) | 736 | 30.4% | 659 | 7 | 12 | 521 | 39 | 80 | 0 | 29 | 48 |
| Party conduct and general pledges (Folio 19) | 189 | 7.8% | 153 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 7 | 114 | 0 | 5 | 31 |
| Total | 2,419 | 100% | 1,865 | 392 | 189 | 740 | 327 | 216 | 1 | 223 | 331 |
Where another sphere of government leads #
Ukweli placed 189 promises in the group “Led by another sphere, council has a role”. Each one cites a row of Ukweli’s table of powers. Four subjects make up 152 of them (80.4%): housing, policing and crime, clinics and primary health care, and a council generating its own power or buying it from private producers. Add traditional leaders in council and disasters, and six subjects make up 173 (91.5%). The table below gives every count.
| Subject, as Ukweli’s table of powers names it | Promises | Filed in |
|---|---|---|
| Housing (building houses, title deeds, informal settlements) | 56 | Folio 15 (54); Folio 16 (1); Folio 18 (1) |
| Policing and crime | 54 | Folio 10 (51); Folio 15 (3) |
| Clinics and primary health care | 24 | Folio 16 (24) |
| Generating its own power or buying from private producers | 18 | Folio 12 (18) |
| Traditional leaders in council | 11 | Folio 18 (11) |
| Disasters (floods, fires, drought response) | 10 | Folio 10 (10) |
| Telecommunications: networks, licensing, spectrum and broadband policy | 8 | Folio 14 (8) |
| Passenger rail (Metrorail and the like) | 3 | Folio 14 (3) |
| Social (rental) housing | 2 | Folio 15 (2) |
| Business licensing generally | 2 | Folio 10 (1); Folio 17 (1) |
| Vehicle licensing and driving licence testing centres | 1 | Folio 17 (1) |
| Total | 189 |
Three subjects readers ask about #
These are word searches over all 2,419 promises, whatever their theme or verdict. They count the promises that contain a word. They are not Ukweli’s findings, and they do not say what a manifesto contains.
Corruption and wrongdoing words: found in 195 promises from all twelve parties. 113 are filed under running the council and 41 under jobs, local economy and small business.
“Free basic” or “indigent”: found in 41 promises from ten parties. 36 are filed under health, social support, youth, sport and culture.
“Coalition”: found in 32 promises from six parties. 22 are filed under party conduct and 10 under running the council.
| Words searched | Promises | Parties | Filed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corruption and wrongdoing words (list in the method notes) | 195 | 12 | Folio 18 (113); Folio 17 (41); Folio 10 (12); Folio 19 (11); Folio 12 (6); Folio 16 (4); Folio 14 (3); Folio 15 (3); Folio 11 (1); Folio 13 (1) |
| “free basic” | 14 | 6 | Folio 16 (12); Folio 18 (2) |
| “indigent” | 33 | 9 | Folio 16 (28); Folio 18 (4); Folio 17 (1) |
| “free basic” or “indigent”, each promise once | 41 | 10 | Folio 16 (36); Folio 18 (4); Folio 17 (1) |
| “coalition” | 32 | 6 | Folio 19 (22); Folio 18 (10) |
How many promises can be checked later #
Ukweli reads each assessed promise for the kind of commitment it makes. A deliverable commits to doing or providing something. Of the 1,865 assessed promises, 721 (38.7%) are deliverables. Only 36 of those 721 contain a number written in digits. The other 685 contain none. A promise with a number or a date is easier for a voter to check later.
| Theme | Assessed | Deliverables | Share of assessed | Deliverables with a number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water and sanitation (Folio 11) | 97 | 64 | 66.0% | 4 |
| Waste, environment and climate (Folio 13) | 87 | 45 | 51.7% | 0 |
| Electricity and energy (Folio 12) | 66 | 33 | 50.0% | 0 |
| Roads, transport and other infrastructure (Folio 14) | 100 | 45 | 45.0% | 3 |
| Health, social support, youth, sport and culture (Folio 16) | 184 | 103 | 56.0% | 3 |
| Safety and crime (Folio 10) | 141 | 56 | 39.7% | 2 |
| Jobs, local economy and small business (Folio 17) | 272 | 99 | 36.4% | 8 |
| Housing, land and title deeds (Folio 15) | 106 | 46 | 43.4% | 2 |
| Running the council (Folio 18) | 659 | 218 | 33.1% | 14 |
| Party conduct and general pledges (Folio 19) | 153 | 12 | 7.8% | 0 |
| Total | 1,865 | 721 | 38.7% | 36 |
Our view #
This is the folio’s own view. It is kept apart from the counts above.
Counting where promises sit does not say which party will keep its word, or which theme matters most to a voter. It shows where a question to a candidate has the council as its answer, and where it needs a second name: a provincial department, a national department or a utility. In the themes with the lowest share inside a council’s powers, the useful question is who else must act, and what the candidate will do to make that happen.
Questions to put to any candidate #
- Which of your promises on housing, policing and clinics does the council decide, and which depend on another sphere of government?
- For each promise that depends on another sphere, whom will you ask, by what date, and how will residents see the answer?
- Most water and waste promises sit within a council’s own powers. Which of yours will you do first, in which ward, and by when?
- Which of your promises will you report on to residents, with a number and a date?
Promises counted in two folios #
This folio adds no promise and moves none. It counts the same 2,419 promises that Folios 10 to 19 count, once each, under the theme where Ukweli filed them. Folio 08 counts the promises about council business across every topic, and Folio 09 collects immigration promises from every theme. Their counts are not added to the ten here. Each folio stands alone.
How we counted, and what limits this #
Ukweli reads each party’s manifesto and lists every promise in it, one by one, in the party’s own words. For the twelve manifestos it had analysed as at 22 October 2026, that list holds 2,419 promises, of which 1,865 carry a verdict, 223 mix different powers and 331 could not be assessed.
- Every figure here is a count of verdicts already published in Folios 10 to 19. The ten themes add up to the published 2,419 promises, of which 1,865 are assessed. Of those 1,865, 392 are within a council’s own powers, 740 are about how the council runs itself, 189 are led by another sphere, 327 are outside, 216 are a party’s own conduct and 1 is shared. Where Ukweli split a sentence into pieces, we count each piece once and leave out the 153 whole-sentence rows that were split.
- The share within a council’s own powers divides by the assessed promises in the theme. The share of all promises divides by all promises in the theme, including those with no verdict. The two use different bases, so compare each only down its own list.
- The order of the eight service themes follows one count. It is not a score or a grade of any theme, and it says nothing about any party. Running the council and party conduct are shown after the eight, drawn as outlines, because most of their promises are about the council’s own business or a party’s own conduct, not a service. That choice is this folio’s own. In the graph, the numbers follow the order of the first figure. Position on the graph is two counts, not a score.
- A theme count says where a promise is filed, not what a manifesto contains. A low count under a theme is not silence on the subject. The word searches in “Three subjects readers ask about” run across all twelve manifestos and every theme for that reason.
- The table of the 189 counts each promise under the first row of Ukweli’s table of powers that it cites. Two of the 189 cite two rows. Counted under every row cited, social (rental) housing has 4 instead of 2 and no other subject changes.
- The word searches are by this folio, not part of Ukweli’s finding. Each promise is counted once per search. The corruption and wrongdoing search looks for the words and word parts in the next item. The other searches look for free basic, indigent and coalition.
- Words searched for corruption and wrongdoing: corrupt, fraud, lifestyle, irregular, stolen, brib, procurement, supply chain, whistle, nepotism, patronage, maladministration, abuse of, abused of, abuses of, conflict of interest, forensic, looting, collusion, misconduct, wrongdoing, theft, tender.
- The kind of commitment (deliverable, aspiration, process) is Ukweli’s reading of the act the sentence commits to. A number here means any digit in the sentence, so a year counts as a number. A sentence with no number may still be checked, for example against a list or a register.
- No promise was placed or moved for this folio, so no new reader check was run. Folios 10 to 19 state their own.
- On 21 October, a test of every sentence in the twelve manifestos found 41 promises with no row in Ukweli's data: DA 19, SACP 15, AMM 5, ANC 1 and UDM 1. On 22 October, 18 of the 41 were added as rows: SACP 9, AMM 5, DA 2, ANC 1 and UDM 1. The other 23 were not added: 17 from the DA and 6 SACP poster lines. In Ukweli's reading they are headings, slogans or framing lines. We did not test where they would be filed, and they are not in the counts here.
- This folio states no new matter of law. Its description of the Constitution’s Schedules is the one used in Folios 10 to 19, read on gov.za and justice.gov.za on 22 October 2026 (Sources 9 and 10).
- Counts only. This folio gives no score, grade or rank, and no party-versus-party reading.
- Updated 25 October 2026: the first figure now shows all ten themes, and the graph and its key were added. No count changed.
- Figures as at 22 October 2026. The party pages move when a manifesto is added. Errors: hello@ukweli.io.
Sources #
- Ukweli, 2026 local government elections, https://ukweli.io/elections, read 22 October 2026 (counts, party list, limits)
- Ukweli, comparison page, all ten themes, https://ukweli.io/manifesto/compare
- The manifesto files for the twelve parties, obtained between 7 September and 14 October 2026: ANC and DA on 7 September, EFF on 8 September; ACDP, ActionSA, AMM, FF Plus, IFP and UDM on 30 September; BOSA and GOOD on 14 October. The SACP text is its Umsebenzi Online newsletter of August 2026 (No 11), saved on 30 September; it is a newsletter that contains the manifesto, not a standalone manifesto file.
- IEC South Africa (@IECSouthAfrica), post on X, 3 September 2026: “Of the 732 political parties registered at various levels, 546 have nominated candidates to contest the elections.” https://x.com/IECSouthAfrica/status/2095459721633218744, read 16 October 2026 and again 25 October 2026
- Electoral Commission of South Africa, “Electoral Commission Certifies 136 790 Candidates to Contest the 2026 Local Government Elections”, https://www.elections.org.za/content/About-Us/News/Electoral-Commission-Certifies-136-790-Candidates-to-Contest-the-2026-Local-Government-Elections/, read 15 and 16 October 2026 (municipalities, seats, candidates)
- Mail & Guardian, “Constitutional Court rules in favour of ANC in IEC candidate nomination dispute”, 15 October 2026, https://mg.co.za/news/south-africa/2026-10-15-constitutional-court-rules-in-favour-of-anc-in-iec-candidate-nomination-dispute/, read 15 October 2026
- South African Government News Agency (SAnews), “IEC gives similarly affected political parties relief after Constitutional Court ruling”, 16 October 2026, https://www.sanews.gov.za/node/85025, read 22 October 2026 (181 ANC candidates, six municipalities, 32 other parties)
- Eyewitness News (EWN), “ANC receives confirmation from IEC that its candidates will be included on ballots”, 19 October 2026, https://www.ewn.co.za/2026/10/19/anc-receives-confirmation-from-iec-that-its-candidates-will-be-included-on-ballots, read 22 October 2026
- Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, Chapter 3 (section 40) and Chapter 7 (sections 151 and 156), https://www.justice.gov.za/constitution/chp03.html and https://www.justice.gov.za/constitution/chp07.html, read 22 October 2026
- Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, Schedules 4 and 5, https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution/constitution-republic-south-africa-1996-schedule-4-functional-areas and https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution/constitution-republic-south-africa-1996-schedule-5-functional-areas, and Government Gazette 17678, printed pages 117 to 120. The Schedules were read on gov.za on 22 October 2026; the Gazette pages were read for Folio 13 and not re-read for this folio.
- Ukweli, Folio 08, “LGE 2026 Manifestos: Whose power is it?”, https://ukweli.io/blog/folio-08-council-powers-2026-manifestos, and Folio 09, “LGE 2026 Manifestos: What the parties promise on immigration”, https://ukweli.io/blog/folio-09-immigration-promises-2026-manifestos
- Ukweli, Folios 10 to 19, the ten theme folios whose figures this folio sets side by side, https://ukweli.io/blog
The standing block #
Read every promise in the party’s own words →
Read the register and download the data →
Integrity Watch is a verified register, neutral by design. Every entry is confirmed against a reputable source, and if it cannot be confirmed, it is not listed. Ukweli is a content integrity platform built by The Orkestra.
Get the next folio
The next Ukweli folio, by email. Nothing else, and you can leave at any time.
The register itself stays free and public, and the full dataset is yours to download whether you subscribe or not.
Know the truth before you publish.
Ukweli checks documents for fabricated and unverifiable citations, sources, quotes and claims, before they leave your hands. Integrify a document · Get the next folio