Latest folio
Deep dive into the 436 of 1,378 analysed promises from ten LGE 2026 manifestos of contesting parties that are outside a council’s listed functions or led by another sphere: what they are about, and who holds the power instead. Whose power is it?

GOOD 2026 City of Cape Town Local Government Election Manifesto.

Promise Assessment — Preview

GOOD logo

Party logos belong to the parties and are shown for identification only. Ukweli is not affiliated with any party.

This analysis covers the GOOD City of Cape Town manifesto only. Ukweli assesses every party’s manifesto on the same terms. Other parties’ manifestos will be added as they are obtained.

Manifesto documents are sourced directly from party publications; Ukweli does not editorially select which parties to include or exclude.

Countdown to election day and the manifesto counts: Know the truth before you vote →

Summary of findings

Ukweli read GOOD’s City of Cape Town manifesto and identified 77 separate promises. 43 have been assessed against the Constitution. Ukweli could not assess the other 34; the reasons are set out below.

Of the 43 assessed promises:

Ukweli gives no overall score or grade to a manifesto. Each promise is assessed on its own, and the detail follows below.

The detail

43assessed
Promises - Running of The Council27
Promises - Within Municipal Powers7
Promises - Led By Another Sphere, Council Has a Role6
Promises - Outside Municipal Powers3
0 of 77 promises assessed0%
0
Promises - Council Can Act On
Promises - Within Municipal Powers7
Promises - Running of The Council27
Promises - Shared With Other Spheres of Government0
0
Promises - Led By Another Sphere
0
Promises - Outside Municipal Powers
0
Promises - Party Conduct

Why only 43 of 77 promises are assessed

Ukweli reads every promise three separate times using an AI model, and checks each answer against the text of the Constitution. A verdict is published when all three readings agree and every check passes (a few are marked “Editor’s ruling”: there the editor decided after checking the Schedules). Where that did not happen, Ukweli publishes no verdict rather than a wrong one. These are the reasons the other 34 were not assessed. Click a reason to read more:

None of these reasons is a finding about a promise or about the party. Each describes a limit of Ukweli’s method. Ukweli may re-check these promises later.

7

27

6

3

34