Party logos belong to the parties and are shown for identification only. Ukweli is not affiliated with any party.
This analysis covers the ICM manifesto only. Ukweli assesses every party’s manifesto on the same terms. Other parties’ manifestos will be added as they are obtained.
Manifesto documents are sourced directly from party publications; Ukweli does not editorially select which parties to include or exclude.
The document Ukweli analysed is ICM’s manifesto for Ekurhuleni. This page covers that manifesto only.
Countdown to election day and the manifesto counts: Know the truth before you vote →
Summary of findings
Ukweli read the ICM’s 2026 local government manifesto and identified 139 separate promises. 104 have been assessed against the Constitution. For 15 more, Ukweli gives no single answer, because each sentence promises several things under different powers or spheres of government. Ukweli could not assess the other 20; the reasons are set out below.
Of the 104 assessed promises:
- 2 are about services a municipality is responsible for delivering.
- 48 are about how the council runs itself: its money, staff, decisions and how it answers to residents.
- 0 are shared with other spheres of government.
- 4 are led by another sphere of government, with a defined role for the council.
- 11 are outside municipal powers. These are not a council's own responsibility; delivery rests with another sphere of government. See these promises ↓
- 39 are commitments about the party's own conduct, not the council's.
Ukweli gives no overall score or grade to a manifesto. Each promise is assessed on its own, and the detail follows below.
The detail
Why only 104 of 139 promises are assessed
Ukweli reads every promise three separate times using an AI model, and checks each answer against the text of the Constitution. A verdict is published when all three readings agree and every check passes (a few are marked “Editor’s ruling”: there the editor decided after checking the Schedules). Where that did not happen, Ukweli publishes no verdict rather than a wrong one. These are the reasons the other 20 were not assessed. Click a reason to read more:
A further 15 are sentences that promise several things falling under different powers or spheres of government. Three separate readings agreed on that, so Ukweli does not give each one a single answer. They are listed under “Mixes different powers”.
None of these reasons is a finding about a promise or about the party. Each describes a limit of Ukweli’s method. Ukweli may re-check these promises later.